Repository navigation
docs(iit,#13410): tranche densite ICT-38 + ICT-8 (deficits minimaux residuels) - #16434
Conversation
Markdown-only (22 insertions, 0 deletion) : lecture d'intervention causale appariee sur 38 (0.0742/0.0625/0.1953, base 1.0000) et lecture de la rampe EWS sur 8 (t=184446, c_tip 2.622 vs pli 2.604, tau variance +0.347 p=1.9e-237, tau AR1 +0.303 p=5.8e-182). Densite 1189 -> 1248 et 1175 -> 1245, plancher 1200 (#13410). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Scope = notebooks CHANGED in this PR, not the whole corpus. Explicit |
Notebook outputs-required (H.4 schema): PASS (every code cell carries an
|
Golden-Set Execution (H.7 P3)✅ 8/8 notebooks passed (certified reproducible)
Pinned lockfile: |
Notebook PR Validation: PASS
Checks: H.1 (no errors), H.3 (execution_count), C.1 (no banned patterns) |
myia-ai-01
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Exact-head review 2973a3ae9850b4f8a1d79d5fb82a2dda71bbf099
Le périmètre markdown-only et tous les nombres sont bien ancrés dans les sorties committées, mais la nouvelle lecture ICT-38 inverse le sens du résultat.
L’exactitude de base vaut 1.0000. Après intervention, le donneur apparié vaut 0.0742, la cible aléatoire 0.0625, et le sham 0.1953. Une exactitude plus basse signifie ici une perturbation plus forte. Le texte conclut pourtant : « le sham perturbe nettement davantage », alors que 0.1953 > 0.0742 montre au contraire que le donneur apparié dégrade davantage l’exactitude que le sham. Le ratio 0.1953 / 0.0742 ≈ 2,6 est arithmétiquement correct mais ne justifie pas la direction causale écrite.
Merci de corriger la comparaison et la conclusion sans toucher au code ni aux outputs, puis de pousser un nouveau head. Toute nouvelle tête réinitialise DWELL ; re-review exacte-head requise. Aucun merge sur cette tête.
Review exact-head #16434 : exactitude basse = perturbation forte, donc le donneur apparie (0.0742) perturbe davantage que le sham (0.1953). Markdown-only 2+/2-, code/outputs intacts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Path-collision (organ #13359/#13615)Cette PR #16434 (
|
myia-ai-01
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving exact head ac219990d59ecf6017ffb9f6474691293aa25616 after re-reading the complete PR surface and independently verifying the repair, notebook invariants, collisions, current-main integration, and current-head checks.
The prior direction error is corrected: the prose now states that the paired transfer is the stronger perturbation (0.0742 accuracy versus 0.1953 for the sham), while preserving the supported approximately 2.6 ratio.
The head merges canonical main 5a1989a92e2185678763a06a76032b7384cd70e5 as its second parent without touching either target notebook. The effective delta remains two inserted markdown cells only; code, outputs, and execution counts are unchanged. The current-head gate settled 79 content checks green, no open PR collides on either notebook, and closingIssuesReferences is empty so #13410 remains open.
This approval lifts the prior content concern only. Merge still requires the reset 120-minute DWELL (matures at 2026-09-16T20:46:59Z) and PR gate to pass. Do not push again merely to refresh the gate.
|
[ADJOINT PREFLIGHT] |
Grain: DEEP/notebook-python -- lane myia-po-2026:CoursIA -- prev: DEEP/notebook-python #16357
Summary
Tranche densite #13410 de cloture des plus petits deficits IIT/ICT : 2 cellules markdown de lecture chiffree (1 + 1). Chaque nombre cite est lu dans les sorties commitees des notebooks eux-memes. Markdown-only : 22 insertions, 0 deletion, aucune cellule code touchee, aucun output edite.
ICT-38-SLens-SelfLocation — 1189 → 1248 : lecture de l'intervention causale appariee (patch experiment) — exactitude de base de l'hote 1.0000, donneur apparie 0.0742 vs cible aleatoire 0.0625 (proche du hasard), sham 0.1953 (exactitude residuelle ~2,6x celle du donneur apparie, qui perturbe donc le plus) : la localisation de soi ne se reduit pas a la position du bloc reinjecte.
ICT-8-AttractorLandscapesEWS — 1175 → 1245 : lecture de la rampe reelle — bascule a t = 184 446, c_tip = 2.622 au franchissement du pli c_fold ≈ 2.604 ; avant-bascule, variance Kendall tau +0.347 (p = 1.9e-237) et AR1 tau +0.303 (p = 5.8e-182) : les precurseurs EWS montent avant la transition, contrairement au regime plateau (AR1 brute 0.9987 saturee, 0.9386 apres amincissement x50).
Validation
pedagogy_density.py: « All judged notebooks meet the density floor » (0 sous-plancher, post-commit).detect_markdown_rendering.py --checkpar notebook : OK 2/2 (rc=0).2973a3ae9: 2 notebooks, 22 insertions, 0 deletion. Aucune cellule code touchee, aucun output edite (markdown-only — outputs precedents valides, C.2/C.3).G-VAR-3 (variation adjacency)
{"guard_pass": true, "blocking": false, "adjacent": true, "genre": "notebook-python", "prev_genre": "notebook-python", "lane": "myia-po-2026:CoursIA", "prev_source": "merged-sequence", "declared_prev_genre": "notebook-python", "prev_pr": 16357, "reason": "adjacence notebook-python->notebook-python hors liste LIGHT : §2 l'autorise si chaque grain est une substance genument distincte -- jugement non mecanisable, signal advisory uniquement.", "sequence_as_of": "2026-09-16T17:01:24Z"}— advisory uniquement (substance distincte : 2 nouveaux notebooks IIT, md-only, deficits minimaux restants de la serie).See #13410 (contribution partielle au rollout densite).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code